Students in higher education spend their time on a plethora of different activities such as taught studies, self-study, employment, volunteering, caring for relatives or leisure activities. Regarding the determinants of students' time allocation, this analysis investigates the rarely asked question whether students’ base income, which is the sum of transfers from the state and the family, has an impact on students’ time allocation for studies (taught studies and personal study time) and gainful employment in Europe. In addition, it is examined how satisfied students are with their time allocation. The theory of rational choice serves as a theoretical framework, whereby Becker's time allocation theory is used as a special form to model the behaviour of students. For the empirical analysis, the data set from the sixth round of the EUROSTUDENT project is used that provides data for up to 25 countries of the European Higher Education Area. Apart from all students, three student groups are in the focus that differ by their dominant source of income, i.e. self-earned income, public support, and support from the family/partner – such an analysis has not yet been conducted. As the data set contains only aggregate data, analysis is limited to descriptive statistics using mean values for various uses of time and income variables. It appears, among other things, that students with own earnings as dominant source of income have the lowest base income and they differ significantly from the other groups in their time allocation: In all countries, students depending on self-earned income have the largest total time budget (consisting of study time and employment time) of all student groups considered. They spend the least time on taught studies and personal study time and by far the most time on employment. They are also the group that most frequently wishes to reduce their working hours and to extend their study-related times for courses and self-study. As part of a concluding normative discourse on justice, it can also be stated that these students are at a disadvantage compared to their peers who depend either on public support or familial support.
Published in | Higher Education Research (Volume 9, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.her.20240906.20 |
Page(s) | 227-245 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Time Allocation, Taught Studies, Personal Study Time, Employment, Satisfaction
[1] | Apolinarski, B., & Gwosć, C. (2020). Studienfinanzierung und studienbegleitende Erwerbstätigkeit als Determinanten des studentischen Workloads: Negative Effekte der Selbstfinanzierung? In D. Großmann, C. Engel, J. Junkermann, & T. Wolbring (Hrsg.), Studentischer Workload. Definition, Messung und Einflüsse (S. 119-143). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. |
[2] | Azzi, C., & Ehrenberg, R. (1975). Household allocation of time and Church attendance. Journal of Political Economy, 83, 27-56. |
[3] | Barke, M., Braidford, P., Houston, M., Hunt, A., Lincoln, I., Morphet, C., et al. (2000). Students in the labour market: Nature, extent and implications of term-time employment among University of Northumbria undergraduates. Nottingham: Department for Education and Employment. |
[4] | Bauer, T. K., & Zimmermann, K. F. (1998). Learning efficiency of economics students, IZA Discussion Papers, 23. Bonn, Germany: Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA). |
[5] | Becker, G. S. 1993. Human Capital. A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education, 3rd ed. New York, London: Columbia University Press. |
[6] | Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago, London: Chicago UP. |
[7] | Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75(229), 493–517. |
[8] | Beerkens, M., Maegi, E., & Lill, L. (2011). University studies as a side job: Causes and consequences of massive student employment in Estonia. Higher Education, 61(6), 679-692. |
[9] | Behr, A., & Theune, K. (2013). The causal effect of off-campus work on time to degree. Education Economics, 24(2), 189-209. |
[10] | Berlin Communiqué (2003). Realising the European Higher Education Area. Retrieved from European Higher Education Area website: www.ehea.info. Accessed 05 November 2019. |
[11] | Body, K. M.-D., Bonnal, L., & Giret, J.-F. (2014). Does student employment really impact academic achievement? The case of France. Applied Economics, 46(25), 3061-3073. |
[12] | Boudon, R. (1977). Effets pervers et ordre social. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France. |
[13] | Bratti, M., & Staffolani, S. (2013). Student time allocation and educational production functions. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 111/112, 103-140. |
[14] |
Bucharest Communiqué (2012). Making the most of our potential: Consolidating the European Higher Education Area. Retrieved from European Higher Education Area website:
www.ehea.info . Accessed 05 November 2019. |
[15] | Callender, C. 2008. The impact of term-time employment on higher education students’ academic attainment and achievement. Journal of Education Policy, 23(4), 359–377. |
[16] | Chan, K. C., Shum, C., & Wright, D. J. (1997). Class attendance and student performance in principles of finance. Financial Practice and Education, 7(2), 58-65. |
[17] | Coleman, J. S. (1991). Grundlagen der Sozialtheorie, Bände 1-3. Munich, Germany: Oldenbourg. |
[18] | Coleman, J. S. & Fararo, T. J. (Eds.) (1992). Rational Choice Theory. Advocacy and Critique. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. |
[19] | Creed, P. A., French, J., & Hood, M. (2015). Working while studying at university: The relationship between work benefits and demands and engagement and well-being. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 86, 48-57. |
[20] | Darolia, R. (2014). Working (and studying) day and night: Heterogeneous effects of working on the academic performance of full-time and part-time students. Economics of Education Review, 38, 38-50. |
[21] |
Destatis (2019). Vollzeitbeschäftigte arbeiteten 2018 im Durchschnitt 41 Stunden pro Woche. Pressemitteilung Nr. 18 vom 30. April 2019. Retrieved from
https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/Zahl-der-Woche/2019/PD19_18_p002.html . Accessed 10 March 2020. |
[22] | Devadoss, S., & Foltz, J. (1996). Evaluation of factors influencing student class attendance and performance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(3), 499-507. |
[23] | Diekmann, A., & Voss, T. (Hrsg.) (2004). Rational-Choice-Theorie in den Sozialwissenschaften. Anwendungen und Probleme. Munich, Germany: Oldenbourg. |
[24] | Dolton, P., Marcenaro, O. D., & Navarro, L. (2003). The effective use of student time: a stochastic frontier production function case study. Economics of Education Review, 22, 547-560. |
[25] | Ebert, T. (2010). Soziale Gerechtigkeit – Ideen, Geschichte, Kontroversen, Bd. 1088. Bonn, Germany: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. |
[26] | Enste, D. H., Haas, H., & Wies, J. (2013). Internationaler Gerechtigkeitsindex – Analysen und Ergebnisse für 28 Industriestaaten, IW-Analyse, 91. Cologne, Germany: Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft Koeln. |
[27] |
EUROSTUDENT (2018). EUROSTUDENT VI database. Retrieved from
http://database.eurostudent.eu/ Accessed 03 December 2019. |
[28] | European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2018). The European Higher Education Area in 2018: Bologna Process Implementation Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. |
[29] | European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2015). The European Higher Education Area in 2015: Bologna Process Implementation Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. |
[30] | Fernex, A., Lima, L., & de Vries, E. (2015). Exploring time allocation for academic activities by university students in France. Higher Education, 69, 399-420. |
[31] | Franzen, A., & Hecken, A. (2002). Studienmotivation, Erwerbspartizipation und der Einstieg in den Arbeitsmarkt. Koelner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 54(4), 733–752. |
[32] | Grave, B. S. (2011). The effect of student time allocation on academic achievement. Education Economics, 19(3), 291-310. |
[33] | Großmann, D., Engel, C., Junkermann, J., & Wolbring, T. (2020). Konzeption und Messung studentischen Workloads. Ein Überblick zu Entstehung, Stand und Herausforderungen. In D. Großmann, C. Engel, J. Junkermann, & T. Wolbring (Hrsg.), Studentischer Workload. Definition, Messung und Einflüsse (S. 3-30). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. |
[34] | Hartwig, K.-H. (1993). Partnerschaften – Ökonomie zwischenmenschlicher Beziehungen. In B.-T. Ramb, & M. Tietzel (Hrsg.), Ökonomische Verhaltenstheorie (S. 33-61). Munich, Germany: Vahlen. |
[35] | Hauschildt, K., Voegtle, E. M., & Gwosć, C. (2018). Social and Economic Conditions of Student Life in Europe, Synopsis of Indicators. EUROSTUDENT VI 2016-2018. Bielefeld, Germany: W. Bertelsmann Verlag. |
[36] | Hauschildt, K., Gwosć, C., Netz, N., & Mishra, S. (2015). Social and Economic Conditions of Student Life in Europe, Synopsis of Indicators. EUROSTUDENT V 2012-2015. Bielefeld, Germany: W. Bertelsmann Verlag. |
[37] | Hovdhaugen, E. (2015). Working while studying: The impact of term-time employment on dropout rates. Journal of Education and Work, 28(6), 631-651. |
[38] | IfD Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach (2013). Was ist gerecht? Gerechtigkeitsbegriff und –wahrnehmung der Bürger. Allensbach, Germany: Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach. |
[39] | Jirjahn, U. (2007). Welche Faktoren beeinflussen den Erfolg im wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Studium? Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 59(3), 286-313. |
[40] | Kalenkoski, C. M., & Pabilonia, S. W. (2009). Does working while in High School reduce U.S. study time? Social Indicators Research, 93(1), 117-121. |
[41] | Kamm, P. (2008). Zeitallokationstheoretischer Beitrag zur Erklärung des Kaufentscheides bei Berufsbekleidung. Munich, Germany: GRIN Verlag. |
[42] |
Keute, A.-L. (2017). For mye betalt arbeid går på bekostning av studietiden. Retrieved from Statistics Norway website:
http://ssb.no/ . Accessed 12 January 2020. |
[43] | Light, A. (2001). In-school work experience and the returns to schooling. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(1), 65–93. |
[44] |
London Communiqué (2007). Towards the European Higher Education Area: responding to challenges in a globalised world. Retrieved from European Higher Education Area website:
www.ehea.info . Accessed 05 December 2019. |
[45] | Meng, C., & Heijke, H. (2005). Student time allocation, the learning environment and the acquisition of competencies, ROA Research Memoranda No. 1E. Maastricht, Netherlands: ROA, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market. |
[46] | Mueller, C., & Tietzel, M. (2002). Merit goods from a constitutional perspective. In G. Brennan, Kliemt, H. & Tollison, R. D. (Eds.), Method and Morals in Constitutional Economics (pp. 375-400). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. |
[47] | Multrus, F., Majer, S., Bargel, T., & Schmidt, M. (2017). Studiensituation und studentische Orientierungen. 13. Studierendensurvey an Universitäten und Fachhochschulen. Berlin, Germany: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). |
[48] | Neill, C. (2013). Rising student employment: the role of tuition fees. Education Economics, 23(1), 101-121. |
[49] | Obermeyer, A., & Evangelinos, C. (2014). Die Theorie der Zeitallokation und die empirische Reisezeitbewertung. Zeitschrift für Verkehrswissenschaft, 85(1), 56-81. |
[50] | OECD (2019). Education at a Glance 2019. OECD Indicators. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. |
[51] | OECD (2013). How’s life?2013: Measuring well-being. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. |
[52] | Opp, K.-D. (2011). Modeling Micro-Macro-Relationships: Problems and solutions. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 35(1-3), 209-234. |
[53] | Orr, D., Gwosć, C., & Netz, N. (2011). Social and Economic Conditions of Student Life in Europe, Synopsis of Indicators, Final Report. EUROSTUDENT IV 2008-2011. Bielefeld, Germany: W. Bertelsmann Verlag. |
[54] | Ramb, B.-T. (1993). Die allgemeine Logik des menschlichen Handelns. In B.-T. Ramb, & M. Tietzel (Hrsg.), Ökonomische Verhaltenstheorie (S. 1-31). Munich, Germany: Vahlen. |
[55] | Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51(1), 125-142. |
[56] | Schwarz, S., & Rehburg, M. (2002). Studienkosten und Studienfinanzierung in Europa. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang. |
[57] | Stevens, P., & Weale, M. (2004). Lazy students? A study of student time use. London, United Kingdom: National Institute of Economic and Social Research. |
[58] | Stinebrickner, R., & Stinebrickner, T. R. (2008). The causal effect of studying on academic performance. The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8(1), 1-53. |
[59] | Thaler, R. H., & Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 392-406. |
[60] | Theune, K. (2015). The working status of students and time to degree at German universities. Higher Education, 70(4), 725-752. |
[61] | Triventi, M. (2014). Does working during higher education affect students’ academic progression? Economics of Education Review, 41, 1-13. |
[62] | Van der Beek, G., & Gwosć, C. (2023). Beckers Zeit-Allokationstheorie. Das Wirtschaftsstudium Wisu, 10(52), 983-989. |
[63] | Vedder, G. (2001). Zeitnutzung und Zeitknappheit im mittleren Management. Personalwirtschaftliche Schriften, Bd. 18, hrsg. von D. von Eckardstein, & O. Neuberger. Munich, Germany: Rainer Hampp Verlag. |
[64] | Voegtle, E. M. (2014). Higher education policy convergence and the Bologna process: A cross-national study. Transformations of the state. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. |
[65] | Voegtle, E. M., Knill, C., & Dobbins, M. (2011). To what extent does transnational communication drive cross-national policy convergence? The impact of the Bologna-process on domestic higher education policies. Higher Education, 61(1), 77-94. |
[66] | Williams, J. R., Masuda, Y. J., & Tallis, H. (2016). A measure whose time has come: Formalizing time poverty. Social Indicators Research, 128(1), 265-283. |
APA Style
Gwosć, C. (2024). The Role of Initial Financial Resources in Students’ Time Allocation – An Empirical Analysis for 25 European Countries. Higher Education Research, 9(6), 227-245. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20240906.20
ACS Style
Gwosć, C. The Role of Initial Financial Resources in Students’ Time Allocation – An Empirical Analysis for 25 European Countries. High. Educ. Res. 2024, 9(6), 227-245. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20240906.20
@article{10.11648/j.her.20240906.20, author = {Christoph Gwosć}, title = {The Role of Initial Financial Resources in Students’ Time Allocation – An Empirical Analysis for 25 European Countries }, journal = {Higher Education Research}, volume = {9}, number = {6}, pages = {227-245}, doi = {10.11648/j.her.20240906.20}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20240906.20}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.her.20240906.20}, abstract = {Students in higher education spend their time on a plethora of different activities such as taught studies, self-study, employment, volunteering, caring for relatives or leisure activities. Regarding the determinants of students' time allocation, this analysis investigates the rarely asked question whether students’ base income, which is the sum of transfers from the state and the family, has an impact on students’ time allocation for studies (taught studies and personal study time) and gainful employment in Europe. In addition, it is examined how satisfied students are with their time allocation. The theory of rational choice serves as a theoretical framework, whereby Becker's time allocation theory is used as a special form to model the behaviour of students. For the empirical analysis, the data set from the sixth round of the EUROSTUDENT project is used that provides data for up to 25 countries of the European Higher Education Area. Apart from all students, three student groups are in the focus that differ by their dominant source of income, i.e. self-earned income, public support, and support from the family/partner – such an analysis has not yet been conducted. As the data set contains only aggregate data, analysis is limited to descriptive statistics using mean values for various uses of time and income variables. It appears, among other things, that students with own earnings as dominant source of income have the lowest base income and they differ significantly from the other groups in their time allocation: In all countries, students depending on self-earned income have the largest total time budget (consisting of study time and employment time) of all student groups considered. They spend the least time on taught studies and personal study time and by far the most time on employment. They are also the group that most frequently wishes to reduce their working hours and to extend their study-related times for courses and self-study. As part of a concluding normative discourse on justice, it can also be stated that these students are at a disadvantage compared to their peers who depend either on public support or familial support. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Role of Initial Financial Resources in Students’ Time Allocation – An Empirical Analysis for 25 European Countries AU - Christoph Gwosć Y1 - 2024/12/25 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20240906.20 DO - 10.11648/j.her.20240906.20 T2 - Higher Education Research JF - Higher Education Research JO - Higher Education Research SP - 227 EP - 245 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-935X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20240906.20 AB - Students in higher education spend their time on a plethora of different activities such as taught studies, self-study, employment, volunteering, caring for relatives or leisure activities. Regarding the determinants of students' time allocation, this analysis investigates the rarely asked question whether students’ base income, which is the sum of transfers from the state and the family, has an impact on students’ time allocation for studies (taught studies and personal study time) and gainful employment in Europe. In addition, it is examined how satisfied students are with their time allocation. The theory of rational choice serves as a theoretical framework, whereby Becker's time allocation theory is used as a special form to model the behaviour of students. For the empirical analysis, the data set from the sixth round of the EUROSTUDENT project is used that provides data for up to 25 countries of the European Higher Education Area. Apart from all students, three student groups are in the focus that differ by their dominant source of income, i.e. self-earned income, public support, and support from the family/partner – such an analysis has not yet been conducted. As the data set contains only aggregate data, analysis is limited to descriptive statistics using mean values for various uses of time and income variables. It appears, among other things, that students with own earnings as dominant source of income have the lowest base income and they differ significantly from the other groups in their time allocation: In all countries, students depending on self-earned income have the largest total time budget (consisting of study time and employment time) of all student groups considered. They spend the least time on taught studies and personal study time and by far the most time on employment. They are also the group that most frequently wishes to reduce their working hours and to extend their study-related times for courses and self-study. As part of a concluding normative discourse on justice, it can also be stated that these students are at a disadvantage compared to their peers who depend either on public support or familial support. VL - 9 IS - 6 ER -